Article
6 determines that dominant undertakings are prohibited from abusing their
dominant positions to eliminate or restrict competition.
According
to Article 17 sets out an illustrative list of prohibited conducts, that
include conduct, that without justification configure excessive prices,
below-cost sales, refusals to deal, exclusive or designated dealing, tying or
imposing other unreasonable transactional terms and discriminatory treatment. The
agencies have the power to determine and sanction other acts of abuse of
dominant market positions, not explicitly mentioned in Article 17.
Under
Article 17(2), a dominant market position is defined as a market position held
by undertakings that are capable of controlling the prices or quantities of
commodities or other transaction terms in a relevant market, or preventing or
exerting an influence on the access of other undertakings to the market.
According
to Article 18, z dominant market position is determined on the basis of the
following factors:
a)
its
share on a relevant market and the competitiveness of the market
b)
its
ability to control the sales market or the purchasing market for raw and
semi-finished materials
c)
its
financial strength and technical conditions
d)
the
extent to which other business mangers depend on it in transactions
e)
the
difficulty that other undertakings find in entering a relevant market
f)
other
factors related to the determination of the dominant market position held by an
undertaking.
The
Rules of the Administration for Industry and Commerce on the Prohibition of
Dominant Market Position elaborate on each of those factors.
According
to Article 19, an undertaking is assumed to hold a dominant market position in
any one of the following circumstances:
a)
the
market share of one undertaking accounts for half of the total, in a relevant
market
b)
the
joint market share of two undertakings accounts for two-thirds of the total, in
a relevant market
c)
the
joint market share of three undertakings accounts for three-fourths of the
total, in a relevant market
However,
under the circumstances specified in (b) and (c) above, if the market share of
one of the undertakings is less than one-tenths of the total, the undertakings
are not considered to have a dominant market position.
According
to Article 47, where an undertaking in violation of the AML abuses its dominant
market position, the enforcement authorities shall instruct it to cease its
conduct, confiscate its unlawful gains and, in addition, impose on it a fine of
not less than 1% but not more than 10% of its sales achieved in the previous
year.
Next
Mergers